Årgång 2016 enligt Champagne Club by Richard Juhlin

★★

Ett knepigt år med många oönskade vädersvängningar vid fel tillfälle. Snö och frost de sista dagarna i april och genomblöt försommar gav problem med fukt och röta. Slutet av sommaren grillade i stället druvorna för hårt med solskador som följd. Skörden blev mycket liten och årgången måste betecknas som svag med ytterst få årgångsviner av klass att vänta sig. 

-

2016 by Curtis Joseph

★★★

• Harvest: September 10th
• Total Sales: 306,074,837 btl
• Yield: 9,163 kg/ha 
• France: 157,713,428 btl
• Area under vine: 33,805 ha 
• Export: 148,361,409 btl
• Average potential alcohol: 9.9% 
•  Prix Constaté : €5.90/kg
• Average total acidity: 7.4 g/l
• Average gluconic acid: 0.1 g/l

Overview: A problematic season that ended reasonably well

Another warm, wet winter preceded the 2016 campaign. Ultimately, however, it was a vintage of floods and drought, frosts, and sunburn, with downy mildew everywhere. By the end of March, there was 50% more rain than in an average year, by the end of June, 71% more, representing by far the most rain in the last twenty years. Springtime temperatures were cooler than usual, culminating in frosts during the last fortnight of April. Damage from the frost was the most significant in the Côte des Bars. The effect of these conditions was the worst outbreak of downy mildew in twenty years, resulting in the loss of approximately 15% of the crop. The rain stopped at the beginning of July for the most part, and the summer was hot and dry, culminating in severe sunburn at the end of August. Ultimately, the ripening was not consistent at harvest, and the Pinot Noir and Meunier were picked well before the Chardonnay, which was not brought in until the end of the month. It was generally considered a better year for black grapes. Fortunately, the warm weather and sunshine at the end of the season reduced the incidence of botrytis. The rate of botrytis overall was about 5% of the surface area of the vineyard. Fortunately, it did not increase even as rain began to fall in the second half of September.

There have been very few finished wines released, and my reaction to the vins clairs that I tasted in the spring of 2017 was mixed. There were relatively few to which I assigned four or five stars. My note for the vin clair for Emmanuel Brochet’s Le Mont Benoit was typical of my impression of the year: “This lacks the structure normally found in a vin clair. It is supple, silky, and remarkably drinkable already at this stage, which does not auger well for the finished Champagne.” (Tasted 2017) I had a similar reaction to the vin clair Pascal Doquet made from grapes grown in Le Mesnil: “Sweet and fresh; drinking well now…” (Tasted 2017).

Producers who blocked the malolactic fermentation were on the right track. From my note on a Meunier vin clair from A.R. Lenoble: “Fermented in stainless steel with malo blocked (as with all wines this year), the fruit had 10˚ potential alcohol at harvest and lovely fruit expression with notes of fresh flowers and citrus. On the palate, it was surprisingly structured, but certainly not tart. pH 3.04, no botrytis.” (Tasted 2017) Ultimately, many vintages in Champagne are saved by good weather at the end of the season, as was 2016. There is no reason to dismiss the year altogether, although even the best talents will have to work hard (and have a bit of luck) to produce top-quality results in 2016.